Periform og Anuform er patenterte prober som har blitt brukt i daglig klinisk praksis og i forskning i mange år. Patentlisensen er gått ut på probene, men det er fremdeles samme gode kvalitet som før. Den eneste forskjellen er at det nå er dukket opp en rekke kopier på markedet som ikke kan vise til dokumentasjon på samme måte som våre prober. Probene er laget av kirurgisk stål, og godkjent etter det strengeste medisinske direktivet MDR. Derfor valgte vi, og fortsetter å velge, Periform og Anuform i Quintet. Under finner du en oversikt over studiene hvor probene våre er brukt i forskning. Probene er også brukt i en rekke studier hvor de ikke er navngitt.

Periform vaginal probe er navngitt i over 200 artikler.

Anuform er navngitt i følgende studier:

• _{Norton C., et al., «Randomized, Controlled Trial of Anal Electrical Stimulation for Fecal Incontinence» (2006)}
• _{Hallam et al., “Enhancing self-efficacy and pelvic floor muscle exercise adherence through sEMG biofeedback: a randomized study” (2012)}
• _{Næss I., Masteroppgave: “Er det forskjell i funksjon I bekkenbunnsmuskulaturen hos kvinner med provosert vestibulodyni (PVD) sammenliknet med friske controller?: En kasus-kontroll studie» (2013)}
• _{Shiraz A., et al., «Design of               sEMG assembly to detect external anal sphincter activity: a proof of concept” (2017)}
• _{Kuo LJ., et al., “Improvement of fecal incontinence and quality of life by electrical stimulation and biofeedback for patients with low rectal cancer after intersphincteric resection” (2015)}
• _{Ploeger D., et al., “Sounds like superman? On the representation of bodies in biosignal performance” (2011)}
• _{Vasquez N., et al., “The interaction of cortico-spinal pathways and sacral sphincter reflexes in subjects with incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study” (2014)}
• _{Cohen-Zubary N., et al., “Home electrical stimulation for women with fecal incontinence: a preliminary randomized control-trial” (2015)}
• _{Kaldijk-Dijkstra AJ., et al., «Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial)” (2020)}
• _{Allison M, et al., “Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: a new treatment for faecal incontinence” (2013)}
• _{Yang MH, et al., “Comparing electromagnetic stimulation with electrostimulation plus biofeedback in treating male refractory chronic pelvic pain syndrome” (2017)}
• _{Bingelis A., et al., “Efficacy control of functional electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles after radical prostatectomy” (2007)}
• _{Johannnessen HH, et al., “Do pelvic floor muscle exercises reduce postpartum anal incontinence? A randomized control trial” (2016)}
• _{Naimy N, et al., “Biofeedback vs. electrostimulation in the treatment of postdelivery anal incontinence: A randomized, clinical trial” (2007)}
• _{Xiaosong W., et al., “Postoperative functional management contributes to anal functional recovery in patients with low rectal cancer after robotic total intersphincteric resection” (2020)}
• _{Schabrun S., et al., “Anal sphincter fatigue: Is the mechanism peripheral or central?” (2011)}
• _{McClurg D., et al., “Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction in multiple sclerosis – a double blind, placebo controlled, randomized clinical trial” (2008)}
• _{Norton C., et al., “Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults” (2012)}
• _{Næss I., et al., “Can maximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction reduce vaginal resting pressure and resting EMG activity?” (2018)}
• _{Næss I., et al., “Pelvic floor muscle function in women with provoked vestibulodynia and asymptomatic controls” (2015)}
• _{Healy C., et al., “The effects of low-frequency endo-anal stimulation on faecal incontinence: a prospective study” (2006)}
• _{Powell M., “ACA research award 2000: A comparison of augmented biofeedback and sensory biofeedback incontinence: a pilot study” (2000)}